Milla Jovovich


Milla Jovovich
Fans of the "Resident Evil" sci-fi film series, starring Milla Jovovich, can now enjoy a first look at the fifth installment, "Resident Evil: Retribution," as the first teaser-trailer has been released.
The 3D movie sees Jovovich's character, Alice, as a captive of the main operation facility of the evil Umbrella Corporation. She later joins forces with resistance fighters and travel around the world to take down the group and those responsible for unleashing a deadly virus that has transformed humans into zombie-like beings.
The trailer, which was recently released online, begins as a commercial for Sony electronics, complete with the opening of The Who's hit rock anthem "Baba O'Riley" and a voiceover by Patrick Stewart, who played Captrain Jean-Luc Picard in "Star Trek: The Next Generation," Prof. Charles Xavier in several "X-Men" films and narrates commercials for National Car Rental.
"My name is Alice and this is my world," Jovovich's character then says amid a backdrop of total chaos, with warships circling what appears to be the White House in a post-apocalyptic universe.
Michelle Rodriguez and Jason Isaacs reprise their role as Rain Ocampo, a member of an Umbrella commando unit, and Dr. William Birkin, a former Umbrella biologist. They last played their parts in the first Resident Evil" film in 2002.
Kevin Durand plays Barry Burton, a character from the "Resident Evil" video games that has not yet appeared in the film series.
The "Resident Evil" film franchise has made more than $675 million worldwide, which each movie making more than the one before. The fourth installment "Resident Evil: Afterlife," was released in September 2010 and has since then made $296 million worldwide - almost three times as much as the first movie. The box office profits for the films are considerably larger outside of the United States.
Jovovich, a 36-year-old actress and model from Ukraine, is also known for her role in the sci-fi film "The Fifth Element." Her last film, a remake of "The Three Musketeers," was a box office flop in the United States, making a little more than $20 million, but fared well overseas with $111 million in earnings. Jovovich lashed out at its U.S. distributor, Summit Entertainment, on Twitter, saying that it "swept" the film "under the rug" in the United States and did not promote it as much as its hit "Twilight" movies.
ReadmoreMilla Jovovich

Caroline Wozniacki


Caroline Wozniacki
Caroline Wozniacki's reign as the queen of tennis, in its 66th week, has been gritty rather than glorious, and three excellent pretenders – Petra Kvitova, Victoria Azarenka and the enigmatic Maria Sharapova – are rattling the palace gates.
The Dane has to reach the quarter-finals here to stave off an insurrection and, to get there, she has to beat Jelena Jankovic . The world No13's match against the American prospect Christina McHale was moved to Rod Laver Arena at the last minute, but did not live up to its centre court billing as she cruised to a 6-2, 6-0 win in an hour and 19 minutes.
Wozniacki might have been dethroned already had Azarenka not faltered against Li Na in Sydney but, as the incumbent, she is progressing through this field smoothly enough and made short work of a tricky assignment against the Romanian Monica Niculescu in the third round .
"She got a lot of balls back," Wozniacki said after beating the 31st seed 6-2, 6-2 in an hour and 16 minutes. "With her slice forehand, it was tough to finish out the point sometimes. But I felt like I was in control."
Was she anxious about the prospect of losing her No1 status – particularly as she has yet to win a slam title? "To be honest, I've proven myself for the last two years," she said. "I've finished No1 twice in a row. For me, the most important thing is to keep improving. If I do that, I know I can play on a very high level. If you win matches in tournaments, then the ranking will be there automatically."
What she cannot control is the destiny of her rivals – and Azarenka looks in menacing form. She shelled Mona Barthel with tough, crisp ground strokes on Friday, against a backdrop of that awful screech, and, after an hour and 28 minutes moved on with a 6-2, 6-4 win to go with her earlier easy workouts, which began with her 67-minute dismissal of Britain's Heather Watson on day one.
On Wednesday she blew away the Australian wildcard Casey Dellacqua, again giving up a single game, but had to endure the cruel mimicry of the crowd. Did she hear it, and did it bother her? "I'm not deaf," she said. "I have no problem with that at all. I knew it's gonna happen. They wanted her to win bad. I respect the crowd, whatever they do. I try to just be focused on my game."
However, the lukewarm reception she got after winning suggested the enmity is gathering. While Azarenka might not the most popular player here this fortnight, she is one of the best. This could be her time. "The main difference is I am much stronger physically [than a year ago]," she said. "I feel I'm on a little bit a roll right now. But it's still a long way."
The first week of the women's singles is a bit of a phoney war. Shots are fired but not a lot of serious damage is done. There are those who do not regard these as mismatches. Such wide-eyed charity is touching.
Azarenka next plays the Czech Iveta Benesova, who looked solid disposing of the Russian qualifier Nina Bratchikova 6-1, 6-3 in an hour and 10 minutes. "She's a very tricky opponent," Azarenka said. "You don't know what to expect with her. Sometimes she goes for her shots; sometimes she misses her shots."
Not the deepest analysis of the art of an opponent's game, but accurate enough. Benesova, who generally stays stuck to the baseline, like the rest of her generation, came to the net four times, but each one paid a dividend. Her judgment and temperament seem in good order.
ReadmoreCaroline Wozniacki

Sandra Bullock


Sandra Bullock
“Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close,” a movie in which she plays the wife of a 9/11 victim, just doesn’t seem like Sandra Bullock’s type of thing – even if Tom Hanks does play her husband.
Still, it brings her back to the screen after a year that was both the best and the worst of her life.
Bullock has the kind of bright, cheeky perkiness that makes you want to hug her and take care of her. The former East Carolina University student has always had a knack for making fun of the fame that seemingly afflicts her. Since her breakthrough in 1994’s “Speed,” she’s been through a reign as America’s sweetheart, even surviving a rash of repetitive, often bad, movies. We kept worrying that she would fatally succumb to what we call “the curse of Meg Ryan” – the struggle to thrive beyond the perky and cute years.
Bullock experienced great highs (winning the 2010 best-actress Oscar for “The Blind Side” and becoming Hollywood’s top-grossing female star) followed by dismal lows (embarrassing custody fights when her husband, Jesse James, was caught having an affair shortly after her Academy Awards triumph).
Suddenly, the girl next door became the woman whose marital troubles were aired in all the tabloids.
In quick succession, she divorced the motorcycle-building host of TV’s “Monster Garage” and went ahead with the adoption of baby Louis (born in New Orleans), whom the couple had planned to adopt before “the trouble.”
It seems strange that the vehicle Bullock picked for her return was a small role as a loving but somewhat uninvolved mother in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close,” which finally opens in local theaters today after many delays.
The movie reportedly went through some 50 script revisions or changes in an apparent effort to offset the suspicion that it was “about” the 9/11 tragedy. The ads claim it is more about the personal aftermath than the event itself.
Although Hanks and Bullock are billed as the stars, the movie is actually about a 9-year-old boy who sets out across New York City on his own looking for clues to a key left by his dead father. The boy worshiped his father but remains distant from his mother, even after the tragedy. Young Thomas Horn (11 at the time of filming and now 14) is the real star – discovered when he won $31,800 on “Jeopardy.”
Sitting at the Regency Hotel in New York City, Bullock dispels any doubts about her choice for a comeback role.
“I wasn’t thinking about any of the commercial things,” she said. “I was just so happy being a mom. This is entirely new to me. Suddenly, I was no longer a selfish actress worried about a career. I had this small thing that was dependent upon me to take care of it. That’s a great feeling, particularly when it’s new. That became my full priority. Whatever next opportunity there was, it had to be amazing for myself and for my son.”
It helped that Hanks was already aboard by the time she heard about the movie. And that the director was Stephen Daldry, who had earned Oscar nominations for all three of his previous efforts – “Billy Elliot,” “The Reader” and “The Hours.”
“He came to my house and told me about the movie, and I was sold,” Bullock said. “I had particularly wanted to work with Stephen since seeing ‘The Reader.’ ”
“Extremely Loud,” though, went through endless changes before its release. One segment, in which her character had a flirtation, perhaps an affair, with a character played by James Gandolfini, was cut altogether.
The film’s subtext struck an emotional chord with Bullock, who was staying at a SoHo hotel in lower Manhattan when the passenger jets struck the twin towers.
“I was in full view of both towers,” she says.
“I saw the second plane, and I saw people helping people. That is the thing that resonates about the city of New York to me. Within seconds, the entire city came together, and residents helped each other in a way they hadn’t the day before.”
“I think,” she added “that the story is about honoring people’s grief, while giving them permission to have grief. I loved that it showed generations in pain – the young boy and the mother – and how they healed each other by listening and talking.”
More than that, she loves New York City itself.
“The movie is shown from a child’s point of view, and I remember that. I remember being a child in New York. My father was a voice teacher here in New York, and my mother sang opera here. Since we lived in Arlington, Va., we were always on the trains coming to New York from D.C. For when my parents had jobs in New York, we had a tiny little studio apartment with a kitchen in the closet. We slept on floors and pullout beds.”
Her father, John Bullock, was an Army employee and part-time voice coach from Birmingham, Ala. Her mother, Helda, was a German opera singer and voice teacher, whom he met when he was stationed in Nuremberg, where Sandra’s maternal grandfather was a rocket scientist. Sandra frequently accompanied her mother on her opera tours throughout Europe, studying ballet and voice. She had small parts in the children’s chorus of various operas.
ReadmoreSandra Bullock

Gina Carano


Gina Carano
Gina Carano enjoyed "getting physical" with some of the most sought after men in Hollywood.
The 29-year-old actress and professional mixed martial arts fighter stars in upcoming spy thriller Haywire.
The star-studded cast is compiled of some of the dreamiest men in the industry, including Channing Tatum, Michael Fassbender and Ewan McGregor.
Gina relished the opportunity to shoot fight scenes with these celebrities.
"I got to be physical with some of the hottest guys in Hollywood," Gina told People magazine.
Gina filmed many brutal sequences with her castmates.
In one scene Michael accidentally knocked Gina out. The actor received a major head walloping from the fighter immediately after Gina regained consciousness.
"When [Michael] slammed my head into the wall, that's the only time I went black," Gina explained. "And then I slammed a vase right into his face when he wasn't expecting it. He didn't get cut maybe a little bit."
Gina fought with all three men on set. She found Channing to be her fiercest opponent.
"[Channing is] like a bro [to me, but] I'd probably want to choke him out real quick," Gina shared. "Because he's actually very athletic."
Haywire will be released in US theatres this weekend.
ReadmoreGina Carano

Kathy Griffin


Kathy Griffin

Kathy Griffin's New Year's Eve show stunt this year, when she co-hosted the event with Anderson Cooper, was stripping down to bra and panties on the air, and on "Late Night with David Letterman" on Thursday night, she duplicated the stunt live (tape for airing, of course), in front of the studio audience --- after being dared to do so by David Letterman himself.

Kathy Griffin explained to "Late Show" host David Letterman why it was appropriate to take her clothes off. She said that every year she tries to up the ante, "because, you know, I've done it for five years now and I've been fired four years in a row,”

She said she didn't tell anyone, not Anderson Cooper or CNN, or anyone. When on Letterman, they also showed the clip of the event, which will refresh the memory of those who missed it Cooper's reaction, which was basically "are you kidding me?"

Meanwhile, on New Year's Eve, while Kathy Griffin was trying to explain the "why" to Cooper, he reminded her of the "no nudity" rule for their events together. As she noted, she wasn't nude; she was still wearing a black bra and panties. Those who might have wanted to see more would have been disappointed to note Griffin was only shown from the waist up (except for moments of jumping up on-air).

Griffin then told Letterman "I mean, David I'll do it, I'll do it right now." Given a "Go" by Letterman, she proceeded to strip. Letterman, playing along, then decided to help her with some of the hooks on her dress.

He also proceeded to admire Griffin's derriere, saying "Wow!" and "Oh, my!" as well. She could not strip as far as she did on New Year's Eve. She told Letterman she "didn't wear underwear because she didn't want a panty line." Whoops. She did wear a bra, once again black.

Letterman then had to help her back into the dress.

Watching the video, at her age --- 51 --- Kathy Griffin has an impressively toned body. Comments around the Web were not kind, though, which is sad, because there are women much younger than her with less viewable bodies.

Interestingly, while there was also criticism of Griffin's strip-tease, you can see as much if not than that on network television, and a lot of simulated sex and making out, as well. We didn't really find what she did all that outrageous, and certainly shared Letterman's impression of her body.
ReadmoreKathy Griffin

Elizabeth Smart


Elizabeth Smart
Elizabeth Smart, whose kidnapping and survival story has captivated the state and nation, is engaged to be married.
And the nuptials of Utah’s semi-celebrity are likely to be the sparkling cider toast — and talk — of the town.
The 24-year-old Smart, a senior at BYU, plans to marry in the summer after becoming engaged last weekend, Chris Thomas of Intrepid Communications confirmed Friday.
Thomas declined to identify Smart’s fiance or provide details about how the two met, but wedding registries online at Williams-Sonoma and Pottery Barn list a July 1 wedding date for an Elizabeth Smart and Matthew Gilmour in Utah.
Gilmour is from Scotland. The two apparently met while Smart was serving an LDS mission in France last year.
Those clamoring for information on whether the blushing bride-to-be will wear her hair up or down, choose lilies or roses for her reception, and if she will say yes to a dress designed by Vera Wang, Monique Lhuillier or local designer Maggie Sottero may be disappointed.
Smart plans to keep her wedding plans close to the vest, Thomas said.
"While she plans to be very publicly involved with her public advocacy work, she has decided she wants to keep the details of her personal life private," Thomas said.
"She is going to be involved in child advocacy work for a long, long time and really decided that she wants to keep her husband and [future] children out of the public spotlight."
With Smart’s devotion to the Mormon faith, it’s a good guess that she and her fiance will likely be married in an LDS temple.
That means a modest wedding gown that won’t be strapless or sleeveless.
With the family’s penchant for privacy, the wedding celebration probably won’t be a big splash reminiscent of William and Kate’s royal affair. But it’s not likely the reception following the temple ceremony will take place in a ward gym, with crêpe paper flowing from the basketball hoops, either.
Smart has become increasingly visible as an advocate for crime victims following her nine-month kidnapping ordeal at the hands of Brian David Mitchell in 2002 and 2003.
In November, Smart held a press conference at the state Capitol in the wake of the Penn State sexual abuse scandal, suggesting the Penn State victims could have benefited from a program Smart would like to see implemented in elementary schools called radKIDS [Resist Aggression Defensively]. The program teaches children about calling 911 and making defensive moves against attackers.
Smart has also implored President Barack Obama to appropriate more resources into investigating sexual abuse crimes against children.
She sent a letter to Obama on Nov. 9 asking the president to provide more funding to the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, which investigates sexual exploitation of children on the Web. She also asked the president to declare a "national emergency" and allot resources for a "massive search and rescue operation" to help children trapped in abusive situations.
Smart has been increasingly visible in public discussions on how to prevent child abuse and help victims. She recently spoke at the 24th Conference on Child Abuse and Family Violence at the Davis Conference Center in Layton and said she traveled to New York and Washington, D.C., earlier this month to work on child abuse prevention initiatives.
At Mitchell’s trial in 2010, Smart testified that her kidnapper raped her almost daily during nine months of captivity, which included a journey to California and back to Utah. Smart was rescued — and Mitchell and his wife, Wanda Eileen Barzee, were arrested — after the three were spotted on a Sandy street in March 2003.
Mitchell, 57, is serving a life sentence in prison. Barzee is serving time in a Texas prison for her role in the crime.
Smart is working with her Elizabeth Smart Foundation, aimed at protecting children from abuse with a focus on prevention, eduction and promoting radKIDS.
In July, Smart signed on as a "contributor" to ABC News to help viewers "better understand missing-persons stories from the perspective of someone who really knows what the family experiences when a loved one goes missing," according to a network spokeswoman.
Smart told ABC News on Friday that she is excited about her engagement, according to the news organization’s website.
"We are looking forward to a bright future together," Smart told ABC.
Smart’s father, Ed Smart, said Friday his future son-in-law is a "fine young man." Ed Smart said he’s pleased for his daughter and hopes she has a happy life.
Thomas noted that Smart’s life is on the upswing.
"This is an exciting next chapter of her life," he said of her engagement. "It’s a banner year for her in many ways."
ReadmoreElizabeth Smart

Gabrielle Union


Gabrielle Union
Gabrielle Union and Dwyane Wade may still be recovering from his 30th birthday bash and his equally lavish birthday gifts but the public still thirst to know more about the gorgeous actress. The biggest question lies around the details of Gabrielle and Dwyane’s relationship – will they get married, have kids? Gabrielle who has been spotted on Miami beach several times with Dwyane’s two boys Zaire, 9, and Zion, 3 is fitting nicely into the step mom role. But what about children with Dwyane? Last year Union shed some light on when she thinks that will happen.
“We’re just happy, so whatever comes down the road is down the road. And it’ll be in order. There would be a wedding before there would be a bambino, so all these reports of mystery babies that they like to keep giving me – there’ll be no baby until you’ve heard about a wedding.”
And on the topic of the marriage, the couple who have began dating since 2009, have both been married before and are in no rush to jump the broom a second time. In their recent interview with Essence Wade stated,
“We’re not rushing it. Both of us have been married before, and we understand that if we choose to marry again, we want it to be right. We both took failing at marriage hard. The next time it’s gotta be forever.”
Sounds like the couple agree on the necessary basics but when it comes to filming their marriage for a reality show – the couple share a different perspective.
Gabby’s views on reality TV last year, “I pay my own bills, first off, so I’ve never put myself in a position to have to be jackass or to have to sell myself down the river for a reality show. I was just raised a little differently and my situation is a lot different being that I have my own career, my own celebrity status on my own, independent, and before him. But, I don’t knock anybody’s hustle, it’s just not my path.”
This year it hasn’t changed much when she told Essence this month, “When it happens (marriage), it’s going to be something that only our friends and family know about.” Wade quickly added, “That is, unless the E! Network comes up with the right number, of course.”
It’s safe to say Dwyane was just kidding – cross your fingers – we would like to see Dwyane and Gabrielle make it work.
ReadmoreGabrielle Union